Back to Office actions

If I need to respond to an office action and submit new evidence, will it cost extra?

Written by Jan Buza

Co-founder of Trama

No, you won’t be required to pay an additional fee if you’re submitting new evidence or information as part of your OA response. This is the case in most jurisdictions.

In the US, the January 2025 fee update introduced a $100 per-class surcharge for certain amendments, but the submission of evidence itself; sales data, specimens, consent agreements; carries no additional government fee. If gathering the evidence requires third-party work (such as a consumer survey), the cost of that work is an indirect cost of the response.

Legal fees for preparing a substantive response with evidence are charged by your representative based on the time and complexity involved.

Related questions

Perceived similarity of trademarks: Lessons from Starbucks trademark disputes

One of the most common reasons for trademark disputes has to do with the perceived similarity between existing trademarks. The two trademarks are considered “similar” if they share common characteristics connected to their appearance, sound, meaning and commercial impression, and if they are used for related goods or services. This is seen as a problem from brand perspective because the consumers might believe that the owners of the two trademarks are related, affiliated, connected, or that the goods or services originate from the same source.

Diamonds are forever, but not for Tiffany

The initial verdict of the court in favour of $21 million infringement damages to be paid by Costco to Tiffany’s has been overturned, with significant implications for brand protection efforts pursued by jewellery makers and retailers.

Liability of parody trademarks: the case of Jack Daniel's vs Bad Spaniels

Satirical adaptations of well-known brands have become a common thing and profitable market for many lesser-known companies. Besides being an effective mean to attract more customers, parody products can also be a good defence against trademark lawsuits, as in many cases, brand owners have limited options to enforce their rights against satirical adaptations.